Following a notice being circulated to the other Zones regarding the closure of the promenade gate, the Plot 222 Mancomunidad has received the following response from Roberto at Sausalito. We have published a Google translated version of his comments below to keep Zone D members informed of the situation.
——————————————————————————————————————————-
I refer to this in my capacity as a member of the homeowners and also as the owner of the shop Restaurant Sausalito.
I received notification informing that, although in a survey conducted last year, most of the owners did not want the gateway to the beach remain closed 24 hours has decided, without any prior consultation closing same.
Be advised that the decision taken affecting the community legal weight only if they have been approved at a meeting, where the owners can express their consent. This has not been the case and the fact that you il holds title as President does not empower or not you you have any committee appointed to carry out this ations, even if you want to justify it as “by way of test “.
On the other hand you know that my establishment exerts an activity open to the street and when I have this public access, since before the existence of the complex, to restrict the same affect this activity.
So I inform you that, to proceed with the closure of the gate, not only be notified to the police and the authorities immediately, but it will initiate legal action to answer for the losses that may result in the discharge of my activity.
attentively
Roberto
I received notification informing that, although in a survey conducted last year, most of the owners did not want the gateway to the beach remain closed 24 hours has decided, without any prior consultation closing same.
Be advised that the decision taken affecting the community legal weight only if they have been approved at a meeting, where the owners can express their consent. This has not been the case and the fact that you il holds title as President does not empower or not you you have any committee appointed to carry out this ations, even if you want to justify it as “by way of test “.
On the other hand you know that my establishment exerts an activity open to the street and when I have this public access, since before the existence of the complex, to restrict the same affect this activity.
So I inform you that, to proceed with the closure of the gate, not only be notified to the police and the authorities immediately, but it will initiate legal action to answer for the losses that may result in the discharge of my activity.
attentively
Roberto
——————————————————————————————————————————-